How the Frak Do I Know If I'm Human?

Warning: BSG and Blade Runner spoilers are hiding in these paragraphs.

I've been catching up on the last season (season 4) of Sci-Fi Channel's Battlestar Galactica. The show is amazing. Like Frank Herbert's Dune, it's not just for sci-fi fans. The series delves deeply into the lives of the characters, as well as issues in politics, religion, and ethics. Since I started watching the series at its start in 2003, a small similarity between Battlestar Galactica and Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? (Blade Runner) had always interested me: the concept of humanity, the paranoia that accompanies not knowing if you are human or not and the question, “What defines human?” But what has caught my attention recently was the concept of fate and destiny that is explored in the show. I will discuss both here. Firstly, the concept of humanity that appears in both Battlestar Galactica and Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?.

Since the beginning of the series, when the humans discovered that their rogue robot creations (known as cylons) had evolved to look like humans, a paranoia spread amongst the people. Anyone could be a cylon. That paranoia was made even stronger when one of Battlestar Galactica's own officers' turned out to be a cylon. Sharon Valerii's programming kicked in, and she shot the Commander at point blank. Sharon hadn't even known herself that she was a cylon. Now the people realized that anyone could be a cylon and not even know it, until their programming suddenly kicked in, causing them to hurt or kill their fellow officers and companions. This meant that all memories of a past life, any memories of family, friends, and childhood, could all be fake. Sharon remembered being a child, she remembered her family, she remembered growing up on the colonies and joining the military. All the memories she had were false memories, implanted in her programming. Each human on the ship then began to wonder if they themselves were a cylon too. Sharon hadn't known she was a cylon. And she most definitely was.

This concept was explored in Philip K Dick's 1968 novel, Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?. The android named Rachel had always been convinced that she was a human, until an identification test revealed to her that she was not. All of her memories of childhood and of her whole life, up to her model's incept date, had been programmed into her. This leads the main character, the android bounty hunter Rick Deckard, to wonder about his own humanity. Is he an android himself? Are all his memories fake as well? Rachel hadn't known that she was an android, and she most definitely was.

These questions in turn bring up the questions “What is human?” and “What defines humanity?” What is the nature of cylons, or androids? Can they love, can they feel? In Battlestar Galactica, these questions are posed countless times, often into the face of a cylon itself. Most importantly though, these stories force us to ask ourselves, “What is human?”. What makes us human? Is it our ability to love and to hate, to mourn and to rejoice? If robots can do those same things, that is not what makes us human. Are we human because we make mistakes? Robots make mistakes too. What is it then? Are humans and robots the same?

Now to discuss fate. At the end of the third season, Galen Tyrol and three other “humans” on board Galactica discover that they are cylons, and that they were cylons the entire time. In the fourth season, Tyrol asks one of his fellow newfound cylons, “How do I know that every move I make isn't programmed?” This got me thinking. Even in the real world, as well as for the humans on the show, we don't know that every move we make isn't “programmed.” If fate exists, if each of us has our own destiny already planned out for us at the beginning of time, then every move we make, and every move we have ever made, was “programmed” into us at conception, or even earlier. If fate exists, humans on Battlestar Galactica have just as little choice in their actions as cylons do. Tyrol's fear is apparent in his voice when he asks the question of himself and of those around him. Fate is a very scary thing. It means you've no control over your life, and no control over your actions. All one can do is resign oneself to one's own fate.

Then again the thought occurs, “What is human?” If cylons or robots have their programming controlling their actions, and humans have fate and destiny controlling their actions, what sets the humans apart from the robots?

Of course this is all speculation based on fiction. But it really gets one thinking; it gets one questioning one's own motives and even existence. What is human? What is humanity? Am I really human? Philip K Dick-esque paranoia ensues.

Unstuck In Time

Yesterday I went to see The Curious Case Of Benjamin Button. It was alright. Far too long and drawn out for my taste, and I do not care to see it again. However, one scene in particular really stuck out to me (apart from the whole scene about how every incident that occurs in the world comes together to create an event). Anyway, the scene that I am writing about is at the beginning of the movie, when the man who created the huge clock explains why he crafted the clock to run backwards. His explanation was like a watered down and less interesting version of my favorite excerpt from my favorite book, Slaughterhouse Five, by Kurt Vonnegut, Jr.
In short, Slaughterhouse Five is an anti-war novel that tells the story of a man named Billy Pilgrim, who "has come unstuck in time". Here is the excerpt:

"Billy looked at the clock on the gas stove. He had an hour to kill before the saucer came. He went into the living room, swinging the bottle like a dinner bell, turned on the television. He came slightly unstuck in time, saw the late movie backwards, then forwards again. It was a movie about American bombers in the Second World War and the gallant men who flew them. Seen backwards by Billy, the story went like this:

American planes, full of holes and wounded men and corpses took off backwards from an airfield in England. Over France a few German fighter planes flew at them backwards, sucked bullets and shell fragments from some of the planes and crewmen. They did the same for wrecked American bombers on the ground, and those planes flew up backwards to join the formation.

The formation flew backwards over a German city that was in flames. The bombers opened their bomb bay doors, exerted a miraculous magnetism which shrunk the fires, gathered them into cylindrical steel containers, and lifted the containers into the bellies of the planes. The containers were stored neatly in racks. The Germans below had miraculous devices of their own, which were long steel tubes. They used them to suck more fragments from the crewmen and planes. But there were still a few wounded Americans, though, and some of the bombers were in bad repair. Over France, though, German fighters came up again, made everything and everybody as good as new.

When the bombers got back to their base, the steel cylinders were taken from the racks and shipped back to the United States of America, where factories were operating night and day, dismantling the cylinders, separating the dangerous contents into minerals. Touchingly, it was mainly women who did this work. The minerals were then shipped to specialists in remote areas. It was their business to put them into the ground., to hide them cleverly, so they would never hurt anybody ever again.

The American fliers turned in their uniforms, became high school kids. And Hitler turned into a baby, Billy Pilgrim supposed. That wasn't in the movie. Billy was extrapolating. Everybody turned into a baby, and all humanity, without exception, conspired biologically to produce two perfect people named Adam and Eve, he supposed."

"The Golden Compass" Movie

So. Today I received a forwarded e-mail from my father entitled "URGENT." Thinking that it was actually something "urgent," I opened it in a hurry. Following is the e-mail I received and my consequent response.

> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> All,
>
> There will be a new children's movie out in December called "The
> Golden Compass". The movie has been described as "atheism for kids"
> and is based on the first book of a trilogy entitled "His Dark
> Materials" that was written by Phillip Pullman. Pullman is a
> militant atheist and secular humanist who despises C. S. Lewis and
> the "Chronicles of Narnia". His motivation for writing this trilogy
> was specifically to counteract Lewis' symbolisms of Christ that are
> portrayed in the Narnia series.
>
> Clearly, Pullman 's main objective is to bash Christianity and
> promote atheism. Pullman left little doubt about his intentions when
> he said in a 2003 interview that "my books are about killing God."
> He has even stated that he wants to "kill God in the minds of
> children". It has been said of Pullman that he is "the writer the
> atheists would be praying for, if atheists prayed."
>
> While "The Golden Compass" movie itself may seem mild and
> innocent, the books are a much different story. In the trilogy, a
> young streetwise girl becomes enmeshed in an epic struggle to
> ultimately defeat the oppressive forces of a senile God. A nother
> character, an ex-nun, describes Christianity as "a very powerful and
> convincing mistake." In the final book, characters representing Adam
> and Eve eventually kill God, who at times is called YAHWEH. Each
> book in the trilogy gets progressively worse regarding Pullman 's
> hatred of Jesus Christ.
>
> "The Golden Compass" is set to premier on December 7, during the
> Christmas season, and will probably be heavily advertised. Promoters
> hope that unsuspecting parents will take their children to see the
> movie, that they will enjoy the movie, and that the children will
> want the books for Christmas.
>
> Please consider a boycott of the movie and the books. Also, pass
> this information along to everyone you know. This will help to
> educate parents, so that they will know the agenda of the movie.
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------

UGH.

I am sorry but this is ridiculous. People get way too upset over things. With this harangue of an e-mail, the authors are doing exactly that against which they are preaching. These are the same fundamentalist Christian people who treat C.S. Lewis' The Chronicles of Narnia as if it is the Holy Bible itself. Since they take Narnia too far it makes sense that they would take Philip Pullman's His Dark Materials and "The Golden Compass" too far; as well as believe that other people are going to be as fanatical as they are and that other people will take "The Golden Compass" too far.

If Pullman wants to provide a counter-trilogy to Lewis' seven-book series, let him! Seriously, what is wrong with that? Why are these Christians afraid that people will be presented with a different viewpoint than theirs? One of the biggest downfalls of Christianity, and many other religions as well, is the completely one-sided point of view its followers possess. The faithful tend to believe so strongly in the correctness of their religion that, to them, it is futile to take into consideration other viewpoints, since their belief is obviously the correct one. However, in reality, all ideas and viewpoints must be taken into consideration in order for a person to say truthfully that believe what they believe because they themselves chose to believe it. Besides, most people want to see more than one viewpoint on any particular story. In fact, the leading conservative news network on the air, Fox News, claims to be "fair and balanced." So, self-reportedly, American conservatives, many of whom also call themselves Christians, want to see all sides of a story. If this is so, why then must we boycott Pullman's stories? Wouldn't that be censoring a side of the story?

It is also quite obvious that this e-mail contradicts itself. Apparently, "the movie itself may seem mild and innocent, [but] the books are a much different story" (par. 3, line 1). Okay, if "the books are a much different story [than the movie]" as the e-mail states, then why are these people so worried? Also, why are they worried since most people today, including a good amount of these fundamentalists, watch movies and never actually read the books off which the movies are based? However, as mentioned in the above paragraph, even if movie-goers actually do read Pullman's books after watching the movie, it never hurts to see more than one side of the story, or, in this case, more than one viewpoint on the world.

Paragraph four of the e-mail goes on to state that "['The Golden Compass'] will probably be heavily advertised" (line 1) as if that is some extreme and crazy tactic that Pullman and the moviemakers are going to employ as part of their evil plot to brainwash children with atheism. Come on, people. Get back to the real world here. Nearly every movie ever made has been promoted up the wazoo. It's Hollywood. People are in it to make money. Perhaps these fundamentalists need to be reminded that even Mel Gibson's "The Passion of the Christ" was "heavily advertised".

As if the first line in paragraph four fails to describe fully the horrid immorality of Pullman and the people involved in "The Golden Compass," the paragraph's next sentence expands upon the evil that is "The Golden Compass." It states, "Promoters hope that unsuspecting parents will take their children to see the movie, that they will enjoy the movie, and that the children will want the books for Christmas" (par. 4, line 2). Oh, the horror. The wicked and sinful promoters of the movie (oh, and we all know that no other movie has ever had promoters) will use their manipulative ways to lure "unsuspecting parents" and their poor, naive children into the "mild and innocent"(par. 3, line 1) movie. After the children enjoy the movie, whose innocence is, apparently, both in complete contrast to and drastically different from the sinister, atheistic books, they will beg their parents for the books. The parents will then buy the books for their children; thinking that these seemingly innocuous books are simply another version of Narnia. However, once the children have got a hold of these fiendish books, they will gobble them up, and the promoters' sinister plan will come to fruition as the impressionable young minds of these children take Pullman's His Dark Materials as absolute truth and begin preaching atheism to the world. Of course, everyone can see this coming since we experienced the Christian version of this scenario when we read The Chronicles of Narnia as children. I mean, we all knew that the lion Aslan was a metaphor for Jesus Christ and that the books were all about Christianity. We were totally thinking of metaphors and allegories when we read those children's books in elementary school. Moreover, in the event that we actually were being subliminally brainwashed when reading Narnia, then we might as well subliminally brainwash today's children with two different viewpoints at the same time. What can I say; the world is a mess.

Oh, and one last thing: I don't know why the author(s) of this message are so upset about Phillip Pullman brainwashing children with atheism while at the same time they are brainwashing their children with Christianity. Why can't people just raise their children to be understanding, accepting, loving people who have the free will to practice (or to not practice) the religion of their choosing?

Ah!
Okay my rant is over...for now.